Diverse Opinions on the Series 'Plevako': A Critical Review
“Plevako” and Domestic Cinema: Why Praise and Criticism Differ?
The Russian series “Plevako” has stirred a whirlwind of emotions among viewers, resulting in polarized opinions. On one side of the fence, there are critiques aimed at the production, acting, and historical authenticity. On the other hand, enthusiastic applause is reserved for the artistic choices and the talent showcased by the production team. Let’s delve into the key points that have ignited such fervent debates.
Bezrukov in the Leading Role: Familiar Face or Predictability?
One of the most talked-about aspects of the show is the performance by Sergey Bezrukov, who steps into the titular role. Many spectators have noted that his mere presence sets a particular tone for the series. Remarks like “Bezrukov in the credits? Time to switch off!” have become a symbol of the audience's weariness with his frequent appearances in popular Russian projects.
Yet, amidst this wave of discontent, there are positive remarks as well. For instance, a viewer from Cherepovets, Vyacheslav, lauds Bezrukov’s performance, stating, “Great film. Bezrukov is splendid!” This dichotomy of views emphasizes the divide in audience perception.
Historical Accuracy: How Critical is Realism?
A significant portion of criticism is directed towards the lack of historical fidelity in the show. For example, a scene depicting the protagonist engaging in a pagan ritual that involves the burning of his mother shocked even the most devoted viewers. Vyacheslav’s comment sums up the general sentiment: “The series doesn’t captivate at all. Bezrukov mumbles, his lines are garbled.”
Nevertheless, some viewers argue that creative liberties are permissible in storytelling. As Nikolai observes, “If you’re after maximum accuracy, Wikipedia is waiting for you.” He suggests that the series should be approached as a form of entertainment rather than a historical documentary.
Comparisons with Western Projects
The series often finds itself compared to international counterparts. A faction of viewers believes that it tends to imitate films by Guy Ritchie. One viewer sarcastically declared, “I’m happy to note that our creatives finally watched Guy Ritchie’s ‘Sherlock Holmes.’” However, another audience member argues that such imitation lacks justification: “‘Gangs of New York’ is a good movie, but it’s hard to label it as historically accurate. Why shouldn’t we forge our own path?” This gives rise to discussions about originality versus influence in filmmaking.
Costumes, Direction, and Script: Strengths of the Project
Despite the torrent of criticism, the series is not without its commendable aspects. Tatyana expresses her appreciation, stating, “I stand and applaud the director, scriptwriters, actors, and costume designers.” In her opinion, the project successfully marries drama, action, and historical narration, showcasing a compelling viewing experience amid the criticisms.
The Character of Plevako: Charisma or Manipulation?
The portrayal of the attorney Fyodor Plevako himself ignites passionate discussions. Evgeny describes him as “an overhyped empty shell and a manipulator,” criticizing the character for appealing to the jury's emotions instead of adhering strictly to facts. Yet, experienced lawyers such as Eduard K. provide a counterargument, asserting, “He acted within the circumstances presented. If such manipulations were effective back then, why not continue employing them?” This debate raises questions about moral integrity versus practical strategy in the courtroom.
The End: To Watch or Not to Watch?
“Plevako” emerges as a project that has incited a wave of discussions owing to its ambiguous artistic and historical choices. For those in search of lighthearted entertainment, it might serve as an enjoyable option. Conversely, viewers seeking a profound immersion into historical reality may very well find themselves disappointed. As one astute commentator pointed out, “If you just want to watch a series and unwind, you’ll likely enjoy it.”
A Question for Viewers
How do you feel about the blend of artistic imagination and historical events in series? Share your thoughts!